Comparing Leading Hit Identification Strategies: DEL, HTS, and FBDD

In the pursuit of new therapeutics, the initial phase of identifying chemical starting points—or "hits"—is crucial. Among the most prominent strategies employed in modern drug discovery are DNA-Encoded Libraries (DEL), *High-Throughput Screening (HTS), and Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD). Each offers a distinct philosophy and set of advantages for navigating the vastness of chemical space.

 

The following table provides a high-level overview of their core characteristics, placing emphasis on the innovative DEL approach.

 

Feature/Aspect DNA-Encoded Libraries (DEL) High-Throughput Screening (HTS) Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (FBDD)
Philosophy Massive parallel interrogation Automated individual testing Efficient binding & optimization
Library Scale 10⁸ – 10¹¹ compounds 10⁵ – 10⁶ compounds 10² – 10⁴ fragments
Key Strength Unprecedented scale and diversity at a low cost per compound tested.

A proven, direct path to identifying drug-like molecules.

High hit rate and superior ligand efficiency of starting points.
Main Consideration Requires off-DNA synthesis and validation of hits; DNA-compatible chemistry needed. High infrastructure cost; limited by the actual diversity of the physical library. Requires sensitive biophysical methods (SPR, NMR); optimization can be lengthy.
Best Suited For Novel targets, rapid exploration of chemical space, and projects seeking novel chemotypes. Targets with established assay formats and organizations with large, diverse compound collections. Challenging targets with well-defined pockets, where high-quality leads are a priority.

 

Summary and Strategic Outlook

 

The choice between DEL, HTS, and FBDD is rarely a question of which technology is superior, but rather which is the most appropriate for a specific project's goals and constraints.

* DEL has emerged as a powerful tool for its ability to screen enormous chemical space in a single experiment, offering a highly cost-effective method for generating novel starting points, especially for emerging or undrugged targets.

* HTS remains the established and reliable workhorse for many organizations, providing a direct route to potent hits from existing libraries.

* FBDD is often lauded for its efficiency and the high quality of its lead compounds, which typically exhibit excellent optimization potential.

A forward-looking R&D strategy often involves integrating these approaches. For instance, a novel hit discovered through a DEL screen can be optimized using the principles of FBDD, while HTS libraries can be augmented with novel chemotypes identified from DELs. This complementary use of technologies leverages the unique strengths of each, creating a more robust and effective drug discovery pipeline.

logo
logo